Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidan James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aidan James[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

COI, Possible blp prod and notability issues. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James is certainly notable, particularly in Hawaii, and when I copy edited the article for the GOCE backlog I found and added several citations. He seems to have an on-going and growing career. Article should NOT be deleted. IMO. Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 21:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added multiple, independent reliable sources to the article. IMO he meets WP:GNG. --MelanieN (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Recent additions by MelanieN and Google News results like [1], [2], [3] and [4] show that this subject meets WP:GNG.--Skr15081997 (talk) 05:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as coverage in reliable sources have been found and added to the article, I think WP:BASIC is passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above sources - Meets GNG easy. –Davey2010^Talk 02:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.