Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aid to the Church in Need

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article could clearly use some work, but consensus here is that there are enough sources to keep this. Should probably be added... ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aid to the Church in Need

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Additional references probably exist, in light of the claims that it operates in many countries and the celebrity endorsement by Benedict. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing much in the way of sourcing, not enough to establish notability.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Slatersteven (talk • contribs) 09:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as google news shows rs coverage, will give examples later, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:50, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this seems to be a fairly substantial Catholic charity. Vorbee (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 18:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment sorry for the delay, these are the sources found, the book ones are the better ones: Zenit, book, book, book, aleteia,Times of Malta Express, Derry Journal, news.mb.com, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:47, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG. Sources mentioned are reliable. Accesscrawl (talk) 06:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.