Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Tamjid Aijazi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Tamjid Aijazi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fail to meet the relevant notability guideline according to WP:CS policy, citations are self driven not from reliable sources as per WP:POV policy and it seems advertisement of an individual so it therefore its Verifiability is highly questioned as per WP:V policy, should be deleted from Wikipedia, moreover it was also listed and resulted as Delete in 24th January 2008 deletion log -- Faizan Munawar Varya^chat_{contributions} 15:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck delete vote by nominator. Your nomination is your vote. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed thanks, I forgot that. :) -- Faizan Munawar Varya^chat_{contributions} 10:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I didn't find significant coverage in reliable sources, and I don't see any other reason to keep. --Michig (talk) 07:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.