Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Saad Al-Azhari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Saad Al-Azhari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for subject and his Institute, written by an account in the name of the Institute and/or himself, and primarily sourced to his/the Institute's website Orange Mike | Talk 03:16, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON for WP:PROF and not enough coverage for GNG. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeletePer nom fails WP:GNG. Now there are thousands of Islamic scholar not clear why this particular subject is notable.Further Ihsan Institute does not appear to be notable does not have a corresponding article WP:WTAF and the article is promotional.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.