Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Ghanem

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. --MelanieN (talk) 02:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Ghanem[edit]

Ahmed Ghanem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a complete mess. It's not a bio of the named subject, but seems rather to be a loose collection of his political interests. The creator and primary contributor User:Hamada2012 has not edited since 30 March 2013. I see two deletion notices on Hamada2012's usertalk page: one for Egyptian cultural project to the world, described as "a cultural project, innovated by the writer and novelist Ahmed Ghanem", the other for Egyptian Revolution From the perspective of Political and sociological and economic, a brief promotional description of a book by Ahmed Ghanem. On the face of it, this all looks like vanity editing. I haven't asked the user; there seems little point, since they stopped editing nearly two years ago. But promoting Ahmed Ghanem does seem to have been all they did on Wikipedia. The same is true of a new user (I suppose perhaps the same person), User:Cultura italiana, who has also added material to Ahmed Ghanem. I have asked that account about possible COI, and also warned them about using Wikipedia for advertising. They have been spamming basically this note about Ahmed Ghanem over many completely inappropriate pages: Tradition, Heritage, Culture of Italy, etc. I hope to get some response from them. Meanwhile, I think we should delete Ahmed Ghanem as advertising, as not notable (compare Google), and (seriously) as not really an article at all, certainly not within shouting distance of being a biography. Bishonen | talk 15:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC). Bishonen | talk 15:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom - the whole thing is a mess of broken English, and the subject seems to fail WP:GNG. WegianWarrior *talk) 19:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* keep the article it's wonder full tobic --Cultura spa (talk) 23:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Socks blocked
how ??[edit]

how can we edit a good article about Ahmed Ghanem founder of hte cultural priject Egypt in the eyes of the world ?? --Moncult (talk) 22:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi[edit]

i think it's important article , but we should organize it well regards`--Kulturaacc (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the article is very interesting, and very good in my opinion, Can keep the article, but I suggest Coordinate Some of few parts --Kulturaacc (talk) 22:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • hello

I think that Mr Bishonen Prejudiced against the article , But I think that The subject of culture and cultural projects is very important. greeting for all--Hamada2012 (talk) 23:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Hamada2012. I'm not prejudiced against the article. As I said above, I thought there wasn't any point asking you if you were connected with Ahmed Ghanem, but I see I was wrong, since you have turned up after almost two years' absence from Wikipedia to comment here. How did you learn about this deletion discussion? And do you in fact have any connection with with Ahmed Ghanem, and/or with User:Cultura italiana ? Bishonen | talk 00:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]
don't delet and keep[edit]

--Hamada2012 (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep the article
  • keep --Moncult (talk) 00:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • don't delet

--Kulturaacc (talk) 23:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cultura italiana. I asked many hours ago on your own page if you're connected with Ahmed Ghanem. Please reply, either there or here. Bishonen | talk 00:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]
I did not leave the Wikipedia all this time, I edit in French and Arabic,and I know the project, and I respect it , and in Egypt. We respect the project very much , so i suggest to keep the article
Greetings to you--Hamada2012 (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is getting farcical. I ask you a third time: do you have any connection with Ahmed Ghanem? Are you that person? You might at least say "I refuse to answer". Bishonen | talk 00:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]
keep the article[edit]

thank you --Cairoegy (talk) 00:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This project is respected[edit]

This project is very respected in Egypt and some other countries Why Bishonen insists to fight it ??!!!!!!!!!! --Cairoegy (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I suggested to maintain the article

And add a lot of information about the project --Cairoegy (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep the article[edit]

and improve it thanks --Egyptmoh (talk) 01:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete -per nom. A uncoordinated collection of meaningless verbage. Reads like a cut-and-paste business plan written by an intern to try and get a job. Not relevant in any way to Wikipedia.  Velella  Velella Talk   01:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and could someone block at least Cultura italiana for spam, please? Most of the edits are getting reverted, but this user is definitely spamming pages and causing others unnecessary work. LaMona (talk) 01:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I have taken care of all the socks on this page and have warned the master. If there is continued socking, please feel free to message me. Elockid (Talk) 01:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as badly written and poorly sourced mess — the question of whether he has the degree of notability required to qualify for a Wikipedia article is so utterly impossible to answer from the way this article is written that WP:NUKEANDPAVE applies regardless of his eligibility or lack thereof. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody without a conflict of interest can write and source a properly encyclopedic version which makes a proper claim of notability. Bearcat (talk) 23:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per everybody. Pax 08:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ahmed_Ghanem&oldid=1071336387"