Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Abou Hashima

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:15, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Abou Hashima[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So he is a businessman and a CEO-but is it notable enough to have a page? Wgolf (talk) 19:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also the person has created this page over and over again and has been deleted numerous times. Wgolf (talk) 19:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment you should check whether at least two sources are to be considered reliable. They seem to be news websites, but I can't vouch for them. If they're independent news outlets, then WP:GNG seems to be satisfied. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I could if I knew Arabic though. Since I don't understand those pages though. Wgolf (talk) 15:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At least one of them has a GTranslate button at the top and for the others you can get a rough translation easily enough; the thing is finding out who runs these websites and what their editorial policy is. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm actually really surprised. From the quality of the article here, I didn't expect much, but this guy has racked up a lot of coverage in the Arabic media and even some in English, not least for his marriage with and divorce from superstar Haifa Wehbe. In more staid news, he and his company have recently been covered by Reuters and The Times.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 07:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 02:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:BASIC per the sources posted above by User:Neil P. Quinn. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.