Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahlam Hamed Younes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker ^talk 06:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ahlam Hamed Younes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-sourced article that does not show how the subject meets a notability guideline such as WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:ACADEMIC. Looks more like a résumé with some peacock terms thrown in than an actual encyclopedia article. Note: foreign-language sources might exist; any input on those is welcome. Kinu ^t/_c 21:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I attempted to make this a bit more readable, but there were sections I could not understand. The article unfortunately lacks specific references, and I can find none in English, making improvement impossible. LaMona (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.