Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ah-Dat-Tor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete `'mikka (t) 00:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be OR. Neither Ah-Dat-Tor nor Simhanada Vajramushti gets any ghits other than WP and a http://lionsroar.name --Zoz (t) 17:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. It has to be, without some more info. Google brings up nothing but the site supplied in the article - "Site under construction". - Motor (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to A Da Tuo - well, I took a quick look at the site, and it claimed that Ah-Dat-Tor is a Romanization of 阿达陀, which does get some hits on Google. Could be a Romanization of the Cantonese pronunciation, so I'd change it to Mandarin. --Wzhao553 07:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced and unverifiable. MCB 05:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Text was lifted verbatim from here. Stubify if someone wants to do it up properly. Medtopic 05:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 19:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above unless some chinese speakers come along and vouch for the content and provide inter-wiki links. StuffOfInterest 15:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.