Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnostica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agnostica[edit]

Almost non existent Christmas alternative invented by a webcomic. - Hahnch e n 00:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - A reason for nomination rather than a summary of the article would be nice. Yomangani ^talk 01:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:OR and non-notable. It is entirely unreferenced and I see little to suggest it is anything other than something made up for the entertainment of Dr. Darren Bleuel and his friends Yomangani ^talk 01:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NN. Michael 01:48, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Yomangani
Delete Original research — FireFox ^(talk) _{11:12, 03 September 2006}
Query. I would like someone to explain the difference between this and Festivus, also a fictional holiday created for entertainment purposes. The distinction may help me decide this article's viability. — Michael J 16:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable through reliable sources. The line in the aticle about how "About twenty-five people participated" seems to explain this topic's lack of cultural impact pretty well. Festivus, on the other hand, has been covered in Time Magazine ("Subverting Christmas", November 21, 2005) and The New York Times, ("Nada, Nada, Nada; Has the End of 'Seinfeld' Ruined Festivus for the Rest of Us?", December 27, 1997). -- Dragonfiend 19:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research. Cynical 21:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I merged this into Nukees once upon a time (and was apparently reverted), as it's a running theme in the comic. I would be fine with merging it back. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 16:26, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.