Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnieszka Lukasiak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 18:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agnieszka Lukasiak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD due to possibly fulfilling WP:CREATIVE 4th criteria (significant critical attention), but I feel that this individual fails to meet general notability, as I cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources. Chzz ► 21:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I've added some sources about minor prizes. Whether it adds up to notability is a question I'll leave to others. --Paularblaster (talk) 23:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - The WP:CREATIVE criteria and other criteria at WP:BIO serve to show notability of people even if they don't meet WP:N. Aside from the awards won by her film Forgotten, already mentioned in the article itself, she has also won acclaim for her earlier film The Nameless War at the 2002 International Documentary Film Festival in Amsterdam (though it didn't win any awards at that festival). Forgotten was also featured at the International Women's Film Festival in Israel. I'd like to disclose that I'm not an expert in regards to film festivals, and certainly not European ones, so I'm not 100% certain that these awards and reviews are that notable. But they seem to indicate at least a weak claim to notability. I'll concede that Lukasiak herself has had little to no coverage of herself in the media, but the films she has created have received some attention. Perhaps someone with more knowledge in this area can weigh in. -- Atama頭 16:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Atama頭 16:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have added another reference from "Screen Daily". Axl ¤ [Talk] 16:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: But more references would be good. - Ret.Prof (talk) 07:56, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.