Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes Boulton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as this is suggesting it's clear enough to simply close, with there being enough information to perhaps suggest a separate article (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 00:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Agnes Boulton

Agnes Boulton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has not been the topic of multiple non-trivial independent discussion in reliable sources. References consist of obituary (WP:ROUTINE) or discussion of the subject's husband (who IS notable). Notability is not inherited either from a spouse nor an ancestor (per WP:NOTINHERITED). A Google search turns up nothing to fill in the gaps in the notability claim. KDS4444 (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

• Clear keep article does a pretty good job claiming that the writing and authorship of Boulten is substantially different than the subject's husband, and has been published and republished independent of the relationship to the husband. Sadads (talk) 00:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
• Keep as clearly regarded as notable by the press during her lifetime which cannot be discounted by notinherited arguments. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
• Keep Really, a Google search turns up nothing? I did a Google search and found: this bio, a brief bio by PBS, information about her work, all on the first page. Please do WP:BEFORE before you nominate. WP:INHERITED does not apply because her biography and her work stand on their own. She just happened to be married to a very famous man. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.