Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agency agreement
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn as I was probably at least 75% asleep when making this AfD, and ignored part of WP:BEFORE. Closing, as A) AfD is not for cleanup, and B) someone is working on the article (non-admin closure) MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 15:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Agency agreement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Source-less since 2007. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 16:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - can I please have a couple of more days to do research on this legal stub? Bearian (talk) 18:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:BEFORE. AfD is not for cleanup. See Google books and scholar. Bearian (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Bearian, ..I forgot I even made this. I should know that by now. Closing as withdrawn because nominator probably did this AfD while half asleep. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.