Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age of Ascent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Ixfd64 (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Age of Ascent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability whatsoever. ♦ 15:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article already had plenty of significant coverage in reliable third party sources before it was nominated. I would almost suggest speedily closing because the nomination doesn't even advance a meaningful justification for deletion. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 13:45, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Torchiest. -- ferret (talk) 13:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Torchiest. -- Rescendent (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.