Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Against The Dark 2:Darkest
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete early close per WP:SNOW. This is a probable hoax that fails WP:V in any event. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Against The Dark 2:Darkest[edit]
- Against The Dark 2:Darkest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CRYSTAL, or alternately just a joke - I can't find any references to a sequel, and given that the original was only released this year I find it highly unlikely that they've started planning already. Ironholds (talk) 12:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No confirmation that it has begun filming, no article per WP:NFF.—Kww(talk) 12:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - likely hoax or hopeful rumour; certainly fails WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 15:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 15:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As editors above have stated, films without evidence that they're actually in production don't meet WP:NFF. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.