Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afterhours.FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Afterhours.FM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Internet radio service with no strong claim to passing WP:NMEDIA and no strong reliable sourcing to support it. All of the footnotes are to blogs or user-generated discussion forums rather than to real media -- and while there's one external link to a piece of real media coverage, it's a Q&A interview with the station's founder. But that's a class of sourcing that can be used for supplementary confirmation of facts after WP:GNG has already been cleared by stronger sources, but cannot bring the GNG in and of itself because it represents the subject talking about himself rather than third parties objectively assessing his impact (and even if we did accept it because magazine, it would still take more than just one legitimate source to pass GNG.) There's simply not enough substance or sourcing here to make it notable. Bearcat (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough depth of coverage to be notable. Ajf773 (talk) 06:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.