Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Eden (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 00:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After Eden (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable 2011 music album. No references. EL is for a commercial site (Sony Music Shop). FiachraByrne (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC),[reply]

Keep - Just because it's a Japanese album, it doesnt't mean it's not notable. Stop with the prejudice. Rafael39 (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. The group is easily notable, and the album is close enough to the confirmed release date that deletion would be moot. (Also, moved to After Eden because some people have this crazy notion that every album has to have (album) in its name.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 03:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The album belongs to a notable Japanese group so it's a keep for me. 11coolguy12 (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.