Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan Army (1978-1992)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Afghan Army (1978-1992)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion because it is an unreliable WP:CFORK of Afghan Army. The only new data in the article, the equipment list sourced from Никитенко Е. Г. Афганистан: От войны 80-х до прогноза новых войн. — М.: Астрель : ACT, 2004, has been amended in the process of transcription to increase equipment numbers falsely: 768 to 1568 tanks, 2900 artillery pieces to more than 4,000, etc. There is nothing here which should not be easily merged with Afghan Army before deletion. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buckshot06 (talk) 02:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A clear WP:TNT case where the article creator copied sources from the Russian Wikipedia article and then changed the information. Kges1901 (talk) 02:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There is also Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan which appears to cover the same topic exactly. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.