Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affiliatecommission

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as copyright violation. NawlinWiki 16:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliatecommission[edit]

Textbook vanispamcruftisement. Prod removed by author. Danny Lilithborne 00:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - classic WP:SPAM and copyvio from [1]. Author has no other edits.Yomangani ^talk 01:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Love it when the spammers don't even try to pretend it's not spam. Fan-1967 01:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this is a copyvio, shouldn't this be tagged for WP:SPEEDY? --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 01:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, CSD A8, db-copyvio. wikipediatrix 02:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest possible delete - Smerdis of Tlön 03:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly spam, note author name and history. Seaphoto 04:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a spam post — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.142.171.199 (talk • contribs)

Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 05:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Peta 06:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with extreme prejudice as per nom. --Dennis The TIger 07:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. MER-C 08:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a load of bull —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.142.171.199 (talk • contribs) 0938 September 8 2006 UTC.

Delete per WP:SPAM. I recommend that 172.142.171.199 reads this link too. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above --mathewguiver 13:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to retract my paypal donation— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.115.81 (talk • contribs)

Keep contingent upon sufficient donation from the above poster. My Alt Account 16:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. How much would be appropriate, do you think? Fan-1967 16:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.