Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affect heuristic
Appearance
The result of the debate was delete. --Stormie 04:48, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as post modern jibberjabber of the worst stripe. The term is not defined, the article's sources are not quoted (eg: which 'Zajonc' is the author referring to and what was the title of his 1980 paper?), there is no context to the article and it is poorly written. Eddie.willers 20:54, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]