Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afelee Valoa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Afelee Valoa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 05:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have you nominated for deletion every Tuvalu soccer player ever? BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article clearly does not meet GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 21:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Keep BeanieFan11 asks a valid question. The nominator is literally asking that an entire nation’s sporting history be wiped away just because Fenui News (the major Tuvalu news outlet) is not available online. 172.58.110.253 (talk) 07:54, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A newspaper is not the only source. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh give us a freaking break. You're seriously alleging that this article on this one-time obscure footballer is the hinge upon which "an entire nation's sporting history" rests? Ravenswing 00:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - fails WP:GNG. --Angelo (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No independent sourcing of this sub-stub. No evidence of notability. No suggestion that his level of play meets any extant notability criteria. And no need of hyperbole-choked hysteria from SPAs who haven't made a single substantive edit to Wikipedia. Ravenswing 00:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom, this fails WP:GNG --PaulPachad (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.