Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerotech Alloys
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 18:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Aerotech Alloys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable company, no reliable references found -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —-- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:28, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteI agree, I don't think every company should be listed, only notable ones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gr8launch (talk • contribs) 21:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability in any reliable sources. --Cybercobra (talk) 04:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 22:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.