Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerosmith/ZZ Top Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aerosmith/ZZ Top Tour[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination, see Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023 March 11#Aerosmith/ZZ Top Tour. Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 02:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't know that a procedural nomination was necessary here, as the subject was previously redirected due to a longstanding absence of citations, whereas my restoration of the article was accompanied by the addition of about a dozen citations, and a fleshing out of what happened with ZZ Top's end of the tour after Aerosmith bowed out. On its merits, I think this should be kept as a concert tour that is specifically notable for the well-sourced number of things that went awry. BD2412 T 02:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Events. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, for the reasons cited above, including the inclusion of more citations, the addition of more information on the ZZ Top side, and the tour's notability particularly as it related to a number of flash-points that occurred on the Aerosmith side. Abog (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Two years ago, I originally redirected the article for needing additional, non-primary sources for six years. Now there are enough third-party sources that the articles passes both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR. Aspects (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:NTOUR as BD2412, presented new sources, more coverage about the tour setbacks and cancellations on both sides and it got the reviews as it should be, so per WP:HEY, the co-headlining concert tour would pass NTOUR because it presented secondary and third-party sources. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:F491:C0B3:D180:8924 (talk) 03:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.