Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight 227 (1956)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Aeroflot accidents and incidents in the 1950s. ✗plicit 14:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroflot Flight 227 (1956)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT: There exists no reliable independent (significant) news coverage of the event, no secondary sources, no in-depth coverage, no (sustained) continued coverage, no demonstrated lasting effects and no long-term impact on a significant region of the world that would make this event notable enough for a stand-alone article. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation, Transportation, and Georgia (country). Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:GNG, nomination and potentially WP:HOAX (this may very well have happened). I can't find any significant coverage of the flight, when looking up "Aeroflot Flight 227" I actually came upon a "Fake plane crash" Fandom page, and that's the extent of what I found. SirMemeGod  12:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Crash is not a hoax, it did happen. It is mentioned at ASN and B3A. Meltdown627 (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Do you have links to those? It would be useful to see what info they have. Mrfoogles (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nevermind, found the link on the list article Mrfoogles (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Aeroflot accidents and incidents in the 1950s. Incident is sufficently covered there. Meltdown627 (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to previously mentioned article; sufficiently covered and attributed to a reliable source. Mrfoogles (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.