Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aelita (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HurricaneFan 25 — 00:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aelita (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed prod. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. Mattg82 (talk) 23:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 15:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant coverage at Pitchfork and PopMatters is sufficient to meet WP:NALBUMS. I've added these sources to the article. Gongshow ^Talk 07:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 16:22, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Due to the sources found by Gongshow, which establish notability. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per substantial coverage from WP:RS sources that has been added. I've also added a quote from The Wire's review. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.