Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advomentary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 14:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advomentary[edit]

Then delete it why don't you! It will be back someday whether you like it or not. Complete Neologism - zero Google hits not counting Wikipedia. This is not the place for made up crap. Save that for the Advomentaries. Rklawton 05:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. AdamBiswanger1 05:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Interlingua ^talk 05:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete why are these cutesy portmanteau neologisms so popular anyway? Opabinia regalis 06:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With zero Google hits, I wouldn't even call this one "popular." Rklawton 07:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is obviously an attempt at the same sort of thing as docudrama, edutainment, etc. Which are all, though better-established, still obnoxious. Opabinia regalis 07:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete, zero google hits. Not even urban dictionary has it. My guess is that it is a right-wing POV article, given the stated origin and list of "advomentaries" supplied. Someone requested that it be Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-06-11#advomentary motion picture film or video too, and got told no. - Motor (talk) 11:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 16:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. just sounds like pointless neologism jargon for what we used to call agit-prop. or even just "an auteur having a point of view" W guice 18:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all portmanteau neologisms. Jammo (SM247) 01:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.