Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advocates for Youth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advocates for Youth

Non-notable charity SGGH ^speak! 18:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I declined the speedy because their previous name had significant coverage and while their current name is a harder search there is substantial coverage. It needs fleshing out, but it's a national non-profit organization that has significant RS coverage. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 18:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Please, please, please nominators do some minimum research before nominating for deletion. Just a quick search gives over 1,400 hits on Google News. That does not include the hits generated by Center for Population Options which gives another 365 hits. Not bad for an organization that was renamed over 17 years ago. As a second point, I noticed that the article was posted as a stub at 13:35 today and tagged for Speedy delete at 13:39, which was denied, retagged aging at 13:56, again denied and finally posted here at Afd at 18:03. My question: are we paying bonus on the number of articles an individual nominates for deletion, I did not hear about? ShoesssS ^Talk 18:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per Shoessss and Travellingcari. --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 19:14, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: non-trivial media coverage is more than enough to assert notability. Victor Lopes (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cleanup and source. — _Maggot^Syn 09:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.