Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adverse (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adverse (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks coverage. No full lenght reviews from reliable sources. sourced to routine announcements. Not a significant award duffbeerforme (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Found this review, in Portuguese. [[1]]. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One blog post is not good enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is one review enough?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The film passes WP:NFO, which says 'The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following: Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.' ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 04:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What an absolute load of bullshit. Film was released in 2020. So five years from then is 5 years into the future. So where are these claimed future articles that simply do not exist? Please reconnect with reality before commenting. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment duffbeerforme, I suggest you read WP:PERSONALATTACKS. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting that I made a personal attack? What attack. Anyone claiming articles exist in the future needs a reality check. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leave DENAMAX (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NFO. KidAd talk 18:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep per WP:NFSOURCES; the film has been the primary topic in here, here and here. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 00:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per NFSOURCES reproductions of PR are not independent. None of those are any good. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NFSOURCES. The film has been picked up by Lionsgate and is going to theaters in 2021. It has NOT been previously released anywhere. duffbeerforme Do you not see this is of public interest? You seem only interested in tearing down projects without looking that there is alot of press and public interest from the cast and news. A Remi Award is a very prestigious award. It is by the Worldfest Houston which is the oldest independent festival in the world! Steven Spielberg, Ang Lee and many others got awards there. Ridley Scott is quoted discussing the festival and the award! It has it's own wikipedia page. WorldFest-Houston International Film Festival Kellyannasmith (talk) 23:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC). — Kellyannasmith (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep : Variety has a dedicated article on Adverse. There are many other sources that are both independent and reliable. AngusMEOW (chatter • paw trail) 09:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Variety has reproduced a PR release. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Right now, I have to say, there aren't sufficiently independent sources to support keeping (because PR releases, even if published in an independent source, are not considered sufficient), but I would be very surprised if they don't exist in the next year or so. OsFish (talk) 05:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Brian Metcalf (who directed the film) as a compromise. That way the article won’t be deleted and the redirect can be removed once significant coverage is available. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 15:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.