Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advent Sleep
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ~ mazca talk 21:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Advent Sleep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural nomination - article was originally tagged for speedy deletion but disputed. Article does not appear to meet music guidelines. --VS talk 10:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 14:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Do Not Delete Legitimate and noteworthy Gothic band. Just needs more sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.238.1 (talk) 15:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm not finding those sources the IP author claims exist. Gnews produces a single hit, which is hardly significant coverage (included in a list of entertainers). I find no evidence that this band passes WP:MUSIC. RayTalk 21:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:MUSIC. 01:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.