Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced tic tac toe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tic-tac-toe. Once Merged - Feel free to Redirect. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced tic tac toe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable variation on Tic-tac-toe. My attempt to redirect to the Variations section of that article was reverted by the article creator without an edit summary or noticeable improvement. --Finngall ^talk 04:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - as suggested. No reason to think this is independently notable enough for a stand-alone article. St★lwart¹¹¹ 04:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect in the absence of further independent reliable sources to establish notability. Deltahedron (talk) 06:18, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect This variant lacks decent proof of notability. The Banner talk 16:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.