Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced DBF Repair (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 03:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Advanced DBF Repair (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources are mostly commercial download sites, with one press-release, and one WP:SPS blog. No indication that it meets Wikipedia:Notability (software). Searched for sources, found a lot of spam and noise, but nothing useful Grayfell (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Despite the fact that the article creator, who I believe to be a paid editor (raised the issue at WP:ANI where she has not replied) states on the talk page "This is a DBF software related article and it was created via the article wizard and reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. Advanced DBF Repair has a place in wikipedia's encyclopedia and there isn't a single line for promotion or any sort or marketing." the sources are either press releases or the usual download sites, etc. I can't find any sources that show notability by our criteria. Dougweller (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not pass Wikipedia:Notability (software). Also, wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. - tucoxn\talk 22:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - No reliable coverage out there at all. Despite what the creator says, it was reviewed by one AfC participant, and seemingly in error too. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.