Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult non-pornographic website

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adult non-pornographic website

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no sources that indicate "adult non-pornographic website" is an actual term used by anyone. Appears to be an arbitrary category without any clear justification for an encyclopedia article. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Internet. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. An earlier version of this article was nominated at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult documentary in 2009, the result being to rename to the current title and cleanup. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Of the four sources cited in this article, two are about sexually explicit websites in general with no discussion of the kind of sexually explicit educational website that this article is about. The other two are archived pages from sexually explicit educational websites (both of which are now apparently defunct). Note that there are no secondary sources cited that discuss this kind of website in general -- just primary sources, with the only secondary sources cited not being directly relevant. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Can't find a single source that isn't a Wikipedia mirror that uses this term, and the type of website it's discussing doesn't seem notable. The closest topic I can think of is sex education, but that's usually applied to adolescents. Ovinus (talk) 02:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a dictionary definition or in this case an original research dictionary definition. This term has not gained traction.--Mvqr (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sources aren't convincing me that this is common parlance. Gnomatique (talk) 23:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.