Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adster Creative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adster Creative

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable company. Everything is sourced to press releases and announcements and I can find no actual coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 16:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:17, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:17, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are no valid reliable sources here to get it over WP:CORPDEPTH — out of 15 footnotes, literally the only one that's actually a reliable or notability-supporting publication at all just features a brief soundbite from the president of the company as one of 13 soundbite-givers in an "answer a generic business question" column which is not a substantive article about the company, and all of the other sources are primary sources that are not valid support for notability at all — but the article makes no notability claim strong enough to exempt it from having to have much better sourcing than this, either. As always, companies are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist. Bearcat (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.