Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Bunk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Bunk[edit]

The person doesn't fullfill the notability guideline. mms 00:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have no idea whether the software is notable, but its creator is not. Shalom ^Hello 02:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. Oyster guitarist 03:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, Linux is notable, its kernel manager may not be. There seem to be some non-English sources but I can't determine whether they sufficiently back up his notability. --Dhartung | Talk 07:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Maintainer of the current stable series of Linux kernels, a highly important role that puts his name alongside Alan Cox (2.2 series) and Marcelo Tosatti (2.4 series). Reliable sources: [1] [2] JulesH 09:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per JulesH. I'm fairly certain that this is a fairly important role within linux and free software. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 14:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The keep arguments here are highly speculative to the point of violating WP:CRYSTAL, and the entire article reads like a WP:COATRACK. Fails WP:BIO as none of the trivial references are actually about the subject, just the kernel he happens to help develop. RFerreira 01:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.