Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Benjamin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

I'm closing this discussion as a Soft Deletion as the editors advocating Delete have limited AFD experience. Another closer can choose to relist this discussion if you feel that move is appropriate. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Adrian Benjamin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Adrian Benjamin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR - google search did not discover any WP:GNG coverage as well. Played a couple of minor roles back in the 60's. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Religion, and United Kingdom. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
• Comment. I won't vote, but will just say that I knew Adrian Benjamin quite well many years ago (1960s). The article seems to be accurate, but not to add up to notable. Athel cb (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

  Was he a nice bloke? LegalSmeagolian (talk) 01:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

  I thought so at the time. Athel cb (talk) 15:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

• Delete. very weak news coverage. Perfectstrangerz (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
• Comment There is a small amount of coverage such as New title rewards service to church but not enough. It's not clear to me whether Vicar under fire is the same person, but even so it's not really enough. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 14:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. No coverage found to meet WP:GNG.Lkomdis (talk) 18:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.