Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Admitas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admitas[edit]

Admitas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to the original author of the article, the company had 14 employees at that time - and the article really hasn't been updated since. I have a hard time believing that a company that had 14 employees would be notable, and although it is possible that it is much larger now, I'm seeing no sign of that. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 04:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. They're now apparently up to 25-50 "employee's number [sic]" and a capitalization of $2.48 million.[1] No significant media coverage that I can find, so it fails WP:CORP. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No real claim of encyclopedic relevance, no coverage found, none cited in the article. --Michig (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:50, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.