Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative department

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative department[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF where the sole source doesn't even mention the term, never mind establish notability. Definition given may be correct for one particular type of "administrative department", but certainly isn't a generally applicable dicdef anyway, so not useful to transfer to Wiktionary either Both articles were prodded for this reason, but not improved.

Also nominated for same reasons: Administrative secretary. Fram (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 15:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Impru20^talk 13:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No improvement even after PROD. Accesscrawl (talk) 04:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.