Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Puri

Aditya Puri[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:GNG: three sources are affiliated (HDFC bank), only independent source is about the bank itself and not him. Notability is not inherited, whether it's from a bank or a daughter.~~ Ian.thomson (talk) 02:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep. HDFC Bank’s Aditya Puri only Indian on Fortune’s top bizmen list

http://m.hindustantimes.com/business-news/hdfc-bank-s-aditya-puri-only-indian-on-fortune-s-top-bizmen-list/story-V8pzePys9JpQP290rK4IZP.html --Anamdas (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. MMall124 (talk) 13:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

updated Awards section. Please review.--Anamdas (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm wondering if the nominator searched for sources outside of the article at all, as one is supposed to do before nominating. This article from Forbes Asia would probably be enough to show notability per WP:GNG, there is also, for example, this and this, also articles on his salary, his bank, 5000 hits on Google News and 370 hits on Google Books, some of which seem to have non-trivial coverage. That's not even going into sources in Hindi, which I can not assess, but I am absolutely sure are numerous. Hell, the Indian banking regulator seems to have changed their rules on mandatory retirement age just so that this guy could keep working. No longer a penguin (talk) 08:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, withdrawn. Sources need to be added, though. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.