Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditi Chatterjee
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aditi Chatterjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It looks like the subject does not pass WP:GNG or WP:ENT. A WP:BEFORE search reveals that no reliable secondary source covers the subject. It could be also WP:TOOSOON. And if we are seeing from the notability point of view, then it certainly doesn't pass WP:NBASIC. There could be a chance of WP:UPE as well, since articles like this (whose subject doesn't have significant role or coverage) are generally created in return for payment. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:59, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Neither the subject is meeting WP:NACTOR nor WP:GNG independently. ManaliJain (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence of satisfying WP:NACTOR. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.