Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adis Husidić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adis Husidić

No appearances in professional competition, although his is a professional sport. Fails WP:ATHLETE and principles established at WP:FOOTY, and although there is a reference, it is from his university , which does not seem sufficiently independent to establish notability. Kevin McE (talk) 10:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Kevin McE (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question. He is included in the category of people who have played for the Bosnia and Herzegovina national football team. Has he played for them? Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to his article, and not in the current B&H squad. Kevin McE (talk) 13:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete then, playing in US college soccer does not pass WP:ATHLETE. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Appears to have been mentioned on [1] and in the tribune as a notable player, though neither article is exclusively about him or his performance in a match Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 21:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --JonBroxton (talk) 00:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems notable enough - [2] Nfitz (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --David Shankbone 07:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not yet played at a fully professional level, and the sources provided appear to be mostly trivial mentions in match reports so it's not quite enough to pass WP:BIO in my opinion. The biggest mention he gets is this article which contains a paragraph detailing the coach's thoughts about him. Also, a number of the hits provided for his nickname seem to be false alarms. Bettia (rawr!) 10:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ATHLETE. Giant Snowman 17:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:N per the sources found by Nfitz and Panyd. --J.Mundo (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - As it stands, the article fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:N. The sources mentioned here don't appear to be non-trivial coverage which would satisfy WP:N, but I seem to remember a fair amount of coverage here in the Chicago newspapers about his exploits with UIC. If someone adds sufficient sources to pass WP:N, I'll happily change my !vote to keep. Jogurney (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.