Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adidam Glossary of terms and concepts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not (or at least shouldn't be) a glossary of new age terms. Recury 18:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. This chap presumably has some disciples, or other indicata of being a successful Messiah; if his movement is notable, then its language is. Tevildo 19:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia is not a list of definitions, of any kind, notable or not. This is Wikipedia policy. Recury 19:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Coredesat 23:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per both the cited parts of WP:NOT. Not appropriate for merging into Adidam. I read a dozen or so definitions, giving me the impression that Adidam seems to be content-free. Barno 23:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.