Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelma Vay de Vaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 02:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adelma Vay de Vaya[edit]

Notability questionable. Notability claims cannot be backed up. Article is orphaned. CaveatLector ^{Talk Contrib} 08:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. —CaveatLector ^{Talk Contrib} 17:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Weak) Keep - book is available via Amazon (ISBN 978-0548111048), in reprint by an important (IMO) publisher of interesting 19th c. texts (Kessinger). Clairvoyants, savants, etc. were important in late 19th and early 20th c. American & European culture. Notability remains questionable, and article does need work, in any event. Searching on "Adelma Vay" turns up more than the whole long name. Jlg4104 (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep And rewrite. I see good things in the future for this article... ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rewrite and move to Adelma Vay, which seems to be the most common of the Baroness' many name variants. See Google books for multiple sources. Abecedare (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.