Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adebayo Temitope Adeleke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lacking independent, significant coverage to establish notability. RL0919 (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adebayo Temitope Adeleke[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing anything more then trivial mentions. Cannot see how they pass either academic or solder. Slatersteven (talk) 08:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Good morning Slatersteven, thanks for keeping the Wikipedia space on the line of purpose - to enlist every form of notable and credible knowledge.
Kindly review the reference again: the school's website, Congress.gov, Dallas News. That someone is not popular to us or sung of daily on radio does not mean he or she doesn't exist especially when they are not in our niche, field or country.
He is a retired US Army major and an academic at Sam Houston State University.
Thank you.
Danidamiobi (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Existence is not the problem being asserted in-depth documentation by multiple people with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy of this person's life and/or works is. The News devotes half of one sentence to this person. Where are this person's life and/or works documented in depth, so that a biography can be created that is in accord with our content policies? Wikipedia:Deletion policy says that we do not keep biographies that cannot be written in depth in accord with content policy. Wikipedia is not a directory of people. Uncle G (talk) 09:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Too little here to indicate notability per either WP:GNG, WP:BIO or WP:PROF. The references are either brief mentions or directory listings, nothing providing specific and detailed coverage. One of the references [1] lists him as a recipient of an immigrant award, but the award appears to be local and not sufficiently significant to confer notability by itself. I am not seeing anything else here. Nsk92 (talk) 12:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No credible claim of notability. Does not meet WP:SOLDIER or WP:PROF. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable as either a soldier or an academic. Not even close on either count.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Non-notable source. Barca (talk) 18:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.