Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addicted to Lost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Addicted to Lost

Delete Non-encyclopaedic, trivial, and crufty Danflave 19:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If kept, it should be merged with Lost (TV series). There isn't enough here for a full article. -- MisterHand 19:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Don't keep it, don't merge it, kill it. This is the very definition of non-encyclopaedic. --PKtm 20:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Lost and cleanup, as a trivia point. (aeropagitica) 20:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this is merely an extended series commercial then it is hardly notable as a contribution to the series, either serious or a spoof/parody. (aeropagitica) 21:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's not encyclopedic and not even notable enough to be merged into the main Lost article. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 20:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article describes the commerical for Lost that ran during the Super Bowl. --Lockley 21:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Commercials are only rarely notable (e.g. 1984 (television commercial)) savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 23:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cruftiest. Article. EVAR. --Deville (Talk) 01:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely non-notable Archon Divinus 05:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.