Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addicted (Jamiroquai album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as having no sources. Alex Muller 21:20, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addicted (Jamiroquai album)

Fails WP:MUSIC: not notable without substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. None provided, none found. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without reliable sources. Even a Jamiroquai web forum ([1]) says it's crap. Corvus cornix_talk 18:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A web forum isn't enough. It isn't even licensed to have unreleased and future works. (Phrasia (talk) 21:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- I don't understand your keep !vote. What sources are you relying on? Corvus cornix_talk 21:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:CRYSTAL, WP:MUSIC and WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 21:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep At least get rid of the release dates and stuff. This album has been confirmed with that title. (Pleasantview (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- Comment - The argument here is that there is not substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Have you found any such coverage? - Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. where has it been confirmed? Corvus cornix_talk 23:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.