Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Add 'em Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Add 'em Up[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only sources are Golden-road.net, a fansite deemed non-notable. No other sources found, absolutely no individual notability. Last AFD was part of a bundle which claimed no prejudice to relisting separatey. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on unsourced & original research mentioned above. Article fails notability guidelines and first page of Google search results only lists links to fansites, YouTube and unrelated pages. Sottolacqua (talk) 21:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, just needs more sources.--It's my Junior year in High School! (talk) 02:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Chris[reply]

Delete. Another one I'd like to keep, but I can't find any sources that pass muster. The question isn't if the article is sourced, but whether it is sourceable - and if sources don't exist, they don't exist. The list of games provides some information, and that'll have to do for now. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.