Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adavosertib
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Pontificalibus 09:01, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Adavosertib[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adavosertib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete as Too Soon Hell in a Bucket (talk) 00:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- When you search in Wikipedia for the subject you will find several mentions of it in other articles. I think that this fact alone suggests importance of subject. In article Protein kinase inhibitor it is in the first row of the table, added in 2018. It is also mentioned in article Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, edit is from 2018. It is also mentioned (as AZD1775) in article Dafna Bar-Sagi. Daevid (talk) 00:57, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Being mentioned in the encyclopedia and it's own article IMO are two different things. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is an entry in a table, where all other entries have own articles. The article itself is only a stub, where I put only basic and interesting information, it can be expanded. It also has its own Wikidata entry https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27074716 from 2016. Daevid (talk) 01:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'll give it some thought and return to this tomorrow. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK. Daevid (talk) 01:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'll withdraw the nom, it is a stub, it isn't advertising or promoting so even if it is a little too soon (it might not be) there is no harm in letting it stay and have it improved. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I found two review articles discussing the drug on Pubmed: [1] [2] I haven't looked at them and don't really have the expertise to evaluate them, but people looking to improve the article might find these useful. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 02:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'll withdraw the nom, it is a stub, it isn't advertising or promoting so even if it is a little too soon (it might not be) there is no harm in letting it stay and have it improved. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK. Daevid (talk) 01:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'll give it some thought and return to this tomorrow. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is an entry in a table, where all other entries have own articles. The article itself is only a stub, where I put only basic and interesting information, it can be expanded. It also has its own Wikidata entry https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27074716 from 2016. Daevid (talk) 01:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Being mentioned in the encyclopedia and it's own article IMO are two different things. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 07:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.