Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam seth Nelson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - Nabla (talk) 18:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Adam seth Nelson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article was previously speedy deleted under the name Adam seth nelson. The subject of the article is an actor turned public relations person. The article is long on name dropping and short on references. A search for reliable sources turns up nothing to substantiate notability. The only Google News result on a search for "Adam Seth Nelson" in quotesis a wedding announcement. Whpq (talk) 16:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Is this close enough to the previous version to warrant a G4? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply G4 applies only if the deleted article was previously deleted through AFD. The previous article was deleted through a speedy. And in any case, I don't know what the contents of the previous article were. -- Whpq (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, didn't catch that. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources in sight. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no notability established. Frank | talk 17:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete if possible for this totally unreferenced article which fails WP:BIO Artene50 (talk) 08:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.