Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Wachter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Wachter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCREATIVE John from Idegon (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 16:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 16:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Mr. Watcher seems notable enough.TH1980 (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:COMPOSER notability requirements. While his award wins are respectful, none are major music competitions. They are youth awards and #4 of WP:COMPOSER says recognition must be for "major music competition not established expressly for newcomers." Actaudio (talk) 07:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree above that he does not meet WP:COMPOSER notability requirements. The only article that I can see that actually is about him is the Hollywood Sential but the link seems broken and the paper is not a Tier 1 source. He needs at least one major RS where the article is mainly about him and not mentioning him in passing amongst others (e.g. this NYT article), and/or about winning awards (which are not material enough for WP:COMPOSER). Britishfinance (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At this time, he doesn’t meet the notability requirements. Trillfendi (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and WP:TOOSOON, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:PROF. He literally got his highest degree last year. Bearian (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.