Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Sinn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . Liz Read! Talk! 00:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Sinn[edit]

Adam Sinn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman, only listings are social media and PR links, appears PROMO Oaktree b (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that a businessman who is capable of acquiring a $100+m house should be considered notable OliverBrown1 (talk) 00:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's not how WP works.   ArcAngel   (talk) 00:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Puerto Rico, Illinois, and Texas. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Hasn't said or done anything remotely notable. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 16:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Looks like a promotional piece with nothing in reliable secondary sources to suggest notability per WP:BASIC. Looking at the sources, (a) he donated money to Texas A&M and the school wrote some PR material about it, (b) he bought an expensive house, and (c) he was involved in some litigation. This is hardly the type of content upon which to base a WP:BLP. --Kinu t/c 15:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.