Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Quinn (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete due to WP:ATHLETE failure. If he ever plays in a fully pro league, drop me a note and I'll restore it. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 11:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Quinn (footballer)[edit]

Association football player who fails WP:ATHLETE because he has never played above the semi-professional Football Conference level. I don't think he is particularly noteworthy otherwise. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Conference National is a notable level of football, and games are often televised. Eldumpo (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 20:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 20:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Has acheived nothing of note, has not played at a high enough level to satisfy WP:ATHLETE, and there seems to be very little in the way of available secondary sources to satisfy WP:BIO. Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 21:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 21:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failure to meet threshold of WP:ATHLETE.-Dino Velvet 8MM (talk) 21:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the Conference National is not a fully-professional league, and so Quinn fails notability at WP:ATH. Games being shown on television does not make players of that league notable. --Jimbo^[online] 21:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you missed out a 'not' above. A game being shown on widely-available TV channels (well, until now!) is inherently notable. Eldumpo (talk) 07:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes I did, thanks. There's people on television every second of the day, it doesn't make them notable. It certainly doesn't make players who play in a league that have a handful of games shown on television notable. --Jimbo^[online] 07:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; non-notable player who fails WP:ATHLETE. Giant Snowman 23:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; Conference as a league may be notable, playing a few games in it isn't. No significant coverage.--ClubOranje^T 11:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cs-wolves (talk) 05:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ATHLETE. By the way, even G.S. Mazara 1946 games are regularly televised in the Western Sicily zone, but I doubt their players are actually notable only for that. --Angelo (talk) 10:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.